Meta Platforms agreed Monday to pay up to $18 billion to settle lawsuits brought by a bipartisan coalition of U.S. states over claims that Facebook and Instagram were designed to addict children and harm their mental health. According to officials, the settlement resolves a multistate lawsuit and includes guaranteed payments over 10 years, avoiding a landmark trial in California federal court.

Under the terms of the settlement, Meta will pay the states up to $18 billion over a 10-year period, with $12.7 billion guaranteed regardless of other platforms’ actions, and about $5 billion contingent on similar commitments from competitors such as YouTube, TikTok, and Snap, according to officials familiar with the agreement. The funds are designated for youth online safety programs and related state priorities, rather than direct compensation to individual users, Meta said in a statement released Monday.

The settlement resolves a multistate lawsuit led by a bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general, involving between 48 and 52 states plus the District of Columbia and several territories, depending on the source.

The original 2023 suit was filed by 29 states alleging that Meta designed Facebook and Instagram to be addictive for children and teens, contributing to mental health harms including anxiety, depression, and body-image issues. Additional states and territories later joined, creating a near-nationwide settlement, according to court records.

The agreement ends a landmark trial scheduled in California federal court, which would have featured testimony from senior Meta executives including CEO Mark Zuckerberg, sources confirmed. Meta resolved related claims across multiple state groupings under a single framework, capping its total financial exposure at $18 billion over the decade.

As part of the settlement, Meta will implement specific safety measures for users aged 13 to 17 on Facebook and Instagram. These include a default two-hour daily time limit on app use, which only parents can modify or disable, officials said. Teen accounts will also receive prompts after 15 minutes of continuous use encouraging breaks, and a “school mode” will reduce or mute push notifications during typical school hours, such as 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.

The agreement mandates “night mode” or overnight blocks that prevent teen access by default between midnight and 6 a.m., with the possibility of broader restrictions if other platforms adopt similar policies. Additionally, like and reaction counts will be hidden by default on posts made by or visible to teen users to reduce social comparison pressures, according to sources familiar with the settlement.

Meta will offer an optional non-personalized feed for teen users that does not rely on engagement algorithms or behavioral profiling, which the company must roll out within four months of the settlement taking effect. The company also agreed to limit recommendation and targeting systems aimed at teens, including disabling features that promote potentially harmful or addictive content, officials said.

Enhanced age assurance measures are a key component of the deal. Meta will deploy technical age-checking systems and policy enforcement to prevent children under 13 from accessing Facebook or Instagram and to restrict teen access to inappropriate content. Major age-assurance requirements must be implemented within one year, with verification and audit provisions allowing state oversight to ensure compliance, according to court documents.

The multistate lawsuits alleged that Meta knowingly designed addictive features such as infinite scroll and algorithmic feeds to increase engagement among minors while disregarding internal research on potential harms. Attorneys general accused the company of violating consumer protection and child safety laws by failing to warn users and by misrepresenting the risks of its platforms to young people. The case attracted national attention as one of the highest-profile legal challenges to social media’s impact on children.

In its statement, Meta denied wrongdoing and did not admit liability but expressed commitment to improving safety for young users. State officials described the settlement as a historic agreement that will reshape how teens interact with social media. The deal also sets a benchmark for other platforms, as part of Meta’s payment is contingent on rivals adopting similar safeguards and making comparable payments to states.

The settlement is structured as a consent judgment, allowing courts and attorneys general to enforce the terms if Meta fails to implement the promised changes. It also consolidates multiple lawsuits into a single framework, providing a coordinated approach to addressing youth online safety across the United States.

The broader implications of the case include establishing new regulatory expectations for social media companies regarding child safety and mental health. The settlement’s enforcement mechanisms and transparency requirements aim to ensure ongoing compliance. The multistate coalition and Meta will oversee implementation, with periodic reporting and audits to monitor progress.

A federal trial began Tuesday as 29 U.S. states sued Meta, alleging the company addicted children to Instagram and Facebook. According to the states’ 233-page complaint, Meta designed the platforms to exploit young users for profit by using addictive features that contributed to mental health harms such as anxiety, depression, and suicide.

The states allege Meta orchestrated a “scheme to exploit young users for profit” by designing Instagram and Facebook with addictive features that contribute to mental health issues among children and teens, including anxiety, depression, insomnia, and suicide, according to court documents and statements from the attorneys general involved.

The lawsuit, filed in October 2023, centers on a 233-page federal complaint brought by a coalition of 29 states, led by California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey, as part of a multidistrict litigation effort.

The complaint accuses Meta of deliberately engineering the platforms to “hook” young users and prolong their engagement, which officials say adversely affects their well-being and violates consumer protection laws. The states contend that Meta misled the public by downplaying or concealing the mental health risks associated with its social media services. New Mexico’s attorney general’s office detailed how the company’s design allegedly degrades children’s sense of self-worth and physical safety, linking it to increased exposure to exploitation, according to court filings.

Lawyers for the states also assert that Meta concealed internal research demonstrating Instagram’s addictive impact on teenagers and its harmful effects on their mental health. The complaint alleges that Meta knowingly misrepresented the safety of its platforms, including the effectiveness of safety features and the prevalence of harmful content, to both the public and young users. These practices, officials say, violated state consumer protection and fraud statutes by withholding material information about the risks posed to children and teens.

The lawsuit further claims that Meta engaged in illegal data collection practices by regularly gathering personal information from children under 13 without parental consent, violating federal and state privacy laws, including the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). The attorneys general argue that Meta’s data practices breach laws such as the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and analogous statutes in other states. Separate lawsuits filed by Florida and other jurisdictions also allege unlawful data collection and privacy violations affecting minors.

Meta has rejected the allegations, disputing claims that it designed its platforms to be addictive or that it sought to hook children. In court filings, the company argued that the states’ claims exceed existing legal frameworks and emphasized its efforts to promote teen safety and well-being. Meta’s motions to dismiss, which cited First Amendment protections and Section 230 immunity, were denied in June 2026 for the 29-state case, allowing the trial to proceed. The company has pointed to its safety tools and parental controls as evidence that it does not intentionally endanger children, though state officials maintain these measures are inadequate or misrepresented.

The litigation seeks billions of dollars in damages and injunctive relief that would require Meta to alter or eliminate features such as “like” counts and infinite scroll, which the states say are central to addictive use patterns among youth. New Mexico has proposed a $3.7 billion fine and extensive design changes, including universal age verification, guardian-linked child accounts, de-encryption of children’s messages, and the appointment of an independent child-safety monitor for five years. Attorneys general from multiple states also seek court declarations that Meta’s platforms constitute a public nuisance with respect to youth harms, along with requirements to fund large-scale abatement plans.

Additional related lawsuits focus on Meta’s alleged role in facilitating child sexual abuse material (CSAM), online solicitation, and human trafficking. These filings document how exploitative content and connections are amplified by Facebook and Instagram, contributing to the risks faced by children online, according to court records and statements from state officials.

The 29-state coalition is part of a broader legal effort involving 41 to 42 jurisdictions, including Washington, D.C., with 33 states joining the original federal complaint filed in the Northern District of California. The coordinated legal action was publicly announced on October 24, 2023, following a multistate investigation into the impact of Meta’s social media platforms on youth. A federal judge in California ruled in October 2024 that Meta must face these lawsuits, rejecting earlier attempts by the company to avoid liability. The trial marks a significant test of youth social-media litigation, with key addiction and concealment claims now moving forward.

Meta reassigned 7,000 Facebook and Instagram employees to artificial intelligence roles and announced plans to cut about 8,000 jobs globally, the company informed staff on May 18, 2026. According to internal communications reviewed by multiple outlets, the restructuring aimed to increase efficiency and prioritize AI product development.

The reassignments involve moving 7,000 employees into newly created divisions focused on artificial intelligence tools and applications, according to an internal memo dated May 18, 2026, sent by Meta’s chief people officer, Janelle Gale. These divisions include teams working on AI-related products such as agents and apps, AI cloud infrastructure, and an internal AI agent known as Hatch, sources said. Bloomberg and The New York Times reported that the changes are part of a broader restructuring to increase investment in AI product development and workflows.

The combination of job cuts and reassignments will impact approximately 20% of Meta’s total workforce, according to multiple reports.

Alongside the reassignments, Meta plans to cut about 8,000 jobs globally, representing roughly 10% of its workforce, sources confirmed. The layoffs were scheduled to begin around May 20, 2026, with some employees already notified in certain locations, including Singapore, according to reports from GBH and other outlets. A Meta spokesperson, Erica Sackin, confirmed that affected employees had been informed of the layoffs.

The restructuring aims to improve efficiency by creating a flatter organizational structure with fewer managerial roles. Janelle Gale’s memo indicated that the new AI-focused divisions would have a reduced number of managers per employee compared to other parts of the company. Reuters and the Times of India cited sources stating that thousands of managerial positions would be eliminated as part of the reorganization. The Strait Times reported that the restructuring includes the elimination of some managerial roles and the establishment of AI-native design teams, reflecting a shift toward more streamlined workflows.

The changes follow CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s directive to make artificial intelligence a central priority for Meta. Reporting from Bloomberg and other outlets linked the restructuring to Meta’s efforts to compete in the generative AI and large language model markets. The company is reallocating resources toward AI agents, product development, and internal AI workflows, according to internal communications reviewed by multiple media organizations.

In addition to the reassignment and layoffs, some reports indicated that Meta is eliminating about 6,000 open positions, though this figure was not confirmed by all major outlets. The overall restructuring is described as a large-scale organizational reset rather than a routine round of cuts. Coverage from The Guardian and GBH noted that the company continues to adjust its AI teams following the reassignment, including allowing some engineers to leave an AI training unit.

The internal memo and subsequent reporting make clear that the restructuring is part of a broader wave of organizational changes at Meta in 2026. The company’s stated goal is to increase efficiency while accelerating AI development and product innovation. The layoffs and reassignments represent a significant shift in Meta’s workforce and operational focus as it adapts to evolving market demands and competitive pressures in the technology sector.

A jury in California found Meta Platforms Inc. and YouTube liable April 7 for creating addictive products that contributed to harmful behavior in a 20-year-old plaintiff. The verdict marked the first time major social media companies were held responsible by a U.S. jury for addictive design, according to plaintiff lawyers, who said the decision signals that accountability has arrived.

The jury’s verdict followed more than 40 hours of deliberations after a weeks-long trial in California. The case centered on K.G.M., a 20-year-old plaintiff who alleged that Meta Platforms Inc. and YouTube designed addictive products that contributed to harmful behavior.

Jurors apportioned 70% of the responsibility to Meta and 30% to YouTube, awarding K.G.M. $3 million in compensatory damages, with total damages potentially reaching $6 million including punitive awards, according to court records and statements from plaintiff lawyers.

The trial included testimony from top executives, including Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, highlighting the companies’ knowledge of the addictive nature of their platforms. Plaintiff attorneys described the verdict as a “referendum” on social media accountability. However, jurors were not unanimous in finding Meta and YouTube liable on all charges, according to trial coverage.

This case followed separate developments in New Mexico, where a jury found Meta liable for endangering children and misleading the public about platform safety. That ruling, issued April 6, ordered Meta to pay $375 million in civil penalties for exposing children to explicit content and predators. Meta announced plans to appeal that decision, with CEO Zuckerberg stating the company has been transparent about the challenges of catching all harmful content, according to Meta spokespeople and court filings.

Meta’s spokesperson Lisa Crenshaw said the company “respectfully disagrees with the verdict and is evaluating our legal options.” YouTube spokesperson José Castañeda confirmed the platform also plans to appeal the California ruling. YouTube’s parent company, Google, faces ongoing federal litigation involving more than 235 plaintiffs suing Meta, Snap, TikTok, and Google over similar claims, with trials scheduled to begin in June 2026.

The lawsuit against Meta and YouTube followed settlements with Snap and TikTok days before the trial started. These companies reached undisclosed agreements with K.G.M., according to sources familiar with the case. The jury’s decision to hold Meta and YouTube liable for addictive design marks the first time major social media firms have faced such a verdict in a U.S. court, according to plaintiff lawyers.

The next phase of the California case will determine the full amount of damages owed and whether the court will order changes to the platforms’ design to reduce addictive features. The verdict is expected to influence ongoing and future litigation involving social media companies and their responsibility for user well-being.

Federal cases involving hundreds of plaintiffs claim that Meta, Snap, TikTok, and Google created products that harm young users’ mental health. These trials, set for mid-2026, could expand the legal scrutiny on social media companies’ content moderation and design practices.

The California verdict and the New Mexico ruling together highlight a growing legal focus on social media platforms’ impact on children and teens. While the companies deny liability and plan appeals, these cases represent a shift toward holding technology firms accountable for the safety and mental health of their users, according to legal experts and advocacy groups.

As the legal battles continue, social media companies face increasing pressure from courts and regulators to address the addictive qualities of their products and the risks posed to younger audiences. The outcomes of these trials could lead to significant changes in industry practices and regulatory policies in the coming years.