Fb Rebrands As “Meta;” Disables Facial Recognition Capabilities | Morrison & Foerster LLP – Social Media

At the end of October, Facebook announced that it would change its name to meta and interact virtually with each other. It is a relatively new concept in technology with many different definitions and interpretations. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg made the announcement at the company’s annual Connect conference, which brings together virtual and augmented reality developers, content creators, marketers and other technologists to explore the growth and expansion of the industry .

In addition to the name change, Facebook also announced the discontinuation of its facial recognition system, which is used by almost a third of all Facebook users, at the beginning of November. This change in technology policy represents a fundamental shift for the company and the entire social media landscape, reflecting the ongoing discussions in the industry about privacy and access to personal data.

Just in time for Christmas business: Pinterest launches its own shopping network

In late October, social media giant Pinterest for images announced the launch of Pinterest TV, a digital destination that allows users and subscribers to interact with Pinterest creators who sell their goods and creations. The channel shows original episodes of “Pinners” in live stream sessions, which are recorded and can be called up in an on-demand archive after the broadcast.

COVID-19 resulted in a meteoric surge in online and live streaming shopping activity served by traditional television channels like QVC and Home Shopping Network, as well as internet companies like YouTube, TikTok, Snapchat and Amazon. Axios reported in September that the live video shopping format was poised for exponential growth, while Coresight Research, a retail and technology analysis firm, predicted that livestream e-commerce would grow to $ 25 billion over the next two years. Dollar sales could grow.

Social media companies take precedence over the intellectual property exemption under the Communications Decency Act; Third Circuit relies on immunity from Internet publishers

Karen Hepp, a well-known Philadelphia television journalist, was photographed by a New York convenience store camera in 2017 without her knowledge or consent. This photo later found its way into a variety of online advertisements ranging from dating services to erectile dysfunction products.

Hepp sued Facebook, Reddit and Imgur in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. She alleged that any platform violated Pennsylvania’s statutory and common right to publication laws. The Third District Court of Appeals recently dismissed the case on the grounds that each of these companies was protected and had immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA). Read the full statement by Hepp v. Facebook, No. 20-2725 (3rd Cir. 2021).

Algorithms Under Fire: Bill Could Change Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act

House Energy and Trade Committee chairman Frank Pallone, Democratic Representative from New Jersey, endorses the Justice Against Malicious Algorithms Act (JAMA), a bill that would amend Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA) on the websites protects against liability over content that has been published by its users. The bill aims to change and eliminate immunity from online platforms when they “knowingly or recklessly use a personalized algorithm to recommend content that contributes significantly to physical or serious emotional harm,” said Axios. The bill does not apply to platforms with fewer than five million unique monthly visitors or users.

Some analysts don’t think the bill will get around to the House of Representatives, but even with its inception, it sends a strong message for social media platforms to introduce stricter guidelines away from content self-regulation.

LinkedIn presence in China is changing due to censorship concerns

LinkedIn, the professional networking giant, recently announced that it would be discontinuing its Chinese version and replacing it with a new job board called “InJobs” to connect Chinese-based professionals with employers. LinkedIn recognizes that doing business in China is challenging in accordance with the requirements of the country.

LinkedIn recently came under fire for recently banning US journalists’ profiles in China. One of these journalists, Bethany Allen-Ebrahimian, pushed the platform about its censorship activities in China.

This unfolding story raises persistent questions about Western tech companies and their role in China, especially when it interacts with the Chinese government and its strict censorship laws and regulations.

[View source.]

Comments are closed.