Beware Huge Authorities’s Tech-Nanny ‘Options’: They Put Alternative & Entry Additional Out of Attain | texasinsider
The unintended consequence of forcing consumers to pay more and making life changing opportunities less accessible
Texas Insider Report: WASHINGTON, DC – In the current congressional session, three big tech regulatory laws were unveiled – HR 3816, HR 3825 and P. 2992 – it would eliminate the digital “opportunity for all” while disrupting the current technology platforms that offer so many types of services to millions of Americans. It has to be repeated in today’s Congress – only by long and careful thought about possible “government solutions” will lawmakers avoid using a cleaver when a scalpel is required.
These bills, if passed, would disrupt too many current technology platforms to mention, prevent continuous and rapid technical development in the future, and make popular apps like FaceTime, Instagram, Google Maps, and LinkedIn difficult to access.
Regardless of what you think or believe about this and various other forms of “social media” – or the growing list of technologies involved in the “Internet of Things” – you should stand up to well-intentioned lawmakers and their potential “solutions” “Beware of special or special practices of concern.
Government-provided “solutions” could also have the unintended consequence of forcing consumers to pay more directly for these apps, adding to the often life-changing opportunities resulting from less accessible technologies.
Another unintended consequence could seriously affect Amazon Prime and perhaps even prohibit its successful model.
How do (or could) these bills affect Amazon Prime? This could potentially have the unintended consequence that the essential link between Fulfillment by Amazon – where merchants pay a fee to attend – and Amazon Prime itself, where Amazon’s ability to fulfill orders internally, is critical to getting them to arrive within two days , is interrupted.
In an Axios article dated November 19, 2021,
“Amazon has warned third party vendors that the legislation could jeopardize its ability to host third party vendors on its platform.”
And Google advises its small business customers that the legislation could make it difficult for users to find a business listing.
That hurts small businesses that use technology to adapt, recover, and reach new prospects.
The Director of Antitrust and Innovation Policy of the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, Aurelien Portuese, recently said that “Senate and House laws would degrade the consumer experience and undermine competition.”
In short, instead of these bills widening consumer choices, they could narrow down choices.
We need legislators who are able to speak precisely – and perhaps more honestly – about any proposed legislative “solution” or its impact on the services and products available through technology, as the potential for unintended consequences will have dramatically different effects on various economic and social sectors could have demographic effects. Consumers challenged.
This would make the opportunities that technology so often offers inaccessible to the individuals and small businesses who benefit most from making technology and opportunity accessible.
Don Rosenberg recorded the situation last month when he wrote to his Fortune Magazine article justified “You can scrutinize big tech, but you can’t punish it for success”:
“Careful analysis and discussion is required before hasty action is taken. This includes a reorientation towards the principles and policies of a free market system, in particular towards the role of competition as a positive force – which has been driving innovation and inventions since we were founded. “