Trump’s lawsuit brings wanted scrutiny to Huge Tech – San Bernardino Solar

Last month, Facebook’s “board of directors” announced that former President Donald Trump would be banned from social media network platforms for two years. This is a cycle of parliamentary elections.

At that point, the board said it would examine whether the country had the same level of “violence, restrictions on peaceful gatherings and other signs of civil unrest”. Whether the 45th President of the United States can post on Facebook and Instagram depends on the board’s assessment of the stability of US society.

This is reminiscent of the jokes that prevailed during the 2008 financial crisis. “If your bank owes $ 100 and you can’t pay, you’re in trouble. If your bank has $ 100 million in debt and you can’t pay, your bank has a problem. “

74 million Americans, including 6 million in California, have voted for Donald Trump’s re-election. Hence, Trump can cause more problems with Facebook than Facebook can with Trump. Make your bet.

The former president is suing Facebook on Twitter and Google (the owner of YouTube). At a press conference, Trump said the trial aimed to “immediately suspend the illegal and shameful censorship of Americans by social media companies.” He is filing for class action status in federal court in Florida.

It is not yet known whether censorship is illegal. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has signed law allowing the state to fined large social media companies for deleting a candidate’s account, however, said Judge Robert Hinkle of the U.S. District Court. “Giving speeches to providers who violate their standards” to high-tech companies probably violated the first change.

Mr Trump’s process is mismatched as high tech companies coordinate with the federal government to select people and messages for censorship and the government censors the speech by acting through a third party. Claims for infringement of the first additional article.

This debate is only one of three lawsuits that Big Tech is involved in. In addition, there is a heated dispute over Article 230 of the Communication Standards Act and a dispute over the Federal Cartel Act.

The Communications Decency Act was passed in 1996. Section 230 states that “the provider or user of the interactive computer services shall not be treated as the publisher or spokesman for information provided by any other content provider”. This allows online businesses, from giant social media platforms to the smallest of bloggers, to take responsibility for words, photos and videos posted by users and commentators, with the exception of certain criminal proceedings and allegations of piracy. You will be protected from inquiries.

According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, these protections are “unique under US law” and one of the reasons why “the most popular online services are based in the United States.”

Many politicians, including Donald Trump and Joe Biden, criticized Section 230. Tech companies are vulnerable here, and the Trump process could be aimed at that. By the time a process reaches the discovery phase, exposure can always lead to turmoil, affect future laws, and harm technology companies.

Another weak point for technology giants is antitrust law. This is a series of ambiguous laws that prohibit unfair competition as defined at any time. Microsoft was followed to the end of the world by offering a free internet browser in 2001. In January, the startup social media app Parler was no longer supported by Apple, Google and Amazon. Is it against antitrust law?

If not yet, probably soon. The House of Representatives Judiciary Committee recently passed six antitrust laws preventing large tech companies from using their platforms to discriminate against their rivals. The law also prohibits the largest tech companies from buying potential competitors or endorsing their products instead of giving them a fair playing field.

For tech companies, the First Amendment is the least of a problem.

But for Americans, when a White House spokesman complains to reporters, Facebook is enough to remove people and posts the White House wants from the internet, as Jen Psaki recently did. There is cause for concern that it will not be quick.

Trump’s case against Facebook alleges that the censorship of technology companies “has a chilling effect on our country’s upcoming political, medical, social and cultural debates.”

It is not the first time that Trump has said what many think.

Write to Susan Shelley: And follow her on Twitter: @Susan_Shelley.

Trump’s lawsuit brings control to Big Tech – San Bernardino Sun Source link Trump’s lawsuit brings control to Big Tech – San Bernardino Sun

Comments are closed.