New CFTC Lawsuit Might Sign Wider Development in Regulation
- The CFTC filed a lawsuit against Digitex and its founder today, claiming that it had failed to register for the proper license to run its trading operations.
- While Digitex markets itself as a decentralized project, it fails to live up to today’s DeFi standards.
- Last week the CFTC made the unprecedented move of suing Ooki DAO.
Share this article
Crypto and commodities derivatives trading exchange Digitex is being sued by the CFTC for offering its services illegally. The regulatory agency also made the unprecedented decision of suing a DeFi protocol and its DAO last week.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a complaint today against cryptocurrency futures trading exchange Digitex and its founder Adam Todd.
The US regulator claims Digitex failed to register for the necessary license to run its operations or comply with Bank Secrecy Act requirements. Todd is also accused of manipulating the price action of Digitex’s native token, DGTX.
Launched in 2018, Digitex marketed itself as a decentralized platform for trading cryptocurrencies, commodities, and other kinds of assets. One of its promised value propositions was its zero-fee model; costs were supposed to be covered by minting the DGTX token and forcing trades through it. The practice was believed to decentralize the exchange by essentially spreading its liquidity among token holders instead of keeping it on the exchange’s main servers. Though it reached an all-time high of $0.16 in October 2018, the DGTX token has since flatlined and is now trading for about $0.000018.
However, Digitex’s architecture is much more centralized than more recent on-chain derivatives exchanges such as dYdX or GMX. Digitex provides escrow services for its futures contracts and does not use automated market-making (AMM) technologies or liquidity pools. In fact, at the time of writing, the exchange’s website is currently inaccessible. While this could theoretically be a “front-end” issue, it seems possible the exchange was simply brought down on the back-end—which would be impossible if it were permissionless, open-source code on the blockchain.
Today’s complaint comes only a week after the CFTC filed a lawsuit against Ooki DAO, also for allegedly running an illegal derivatives trading exchange. The two cases differ because the Ooki protocol is a true smart contract platform and is thus decentralized. However, the CFTC made the unprecedented decision to hold stakers of BZRX tokens (Ooki’s native coin) liable along with the protocol’s founders. It also issued subpoenas to all DAO members by submitting the documents through the protocol’s online help chat box.
Compared to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the CFTC has historically been viewed as less hostile to the crypto industry. However, the agency’s lawsuit against Ooki DAO raised deep concerns in the space. Blockchain Association lawyer Jake Chervinsky stated that the move “may be the most egregious example of regulation by enforcement in the history of crypto.” And while the CFTC complaint against Digitex shouldn’t be seen in the same light (since the exchange cannot claim the same level of decentralization), it may be a sign of further enforcement actions.
Disclaimer: At the time of writing, the author of this piece owned BTC, ETH, and several other cryptocurrencies.
Share this article
The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website . Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.
You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.
See full terms and conditions.
Comments are closed.