Mark Zuckerberg threatened to drag UK funding in secret assembly with Matt Hancock — The Bureau of Investigative Journalism
The ICO blamed DCMS for violating the Freedom of Information Act after taking a year to acknowledge that it had records of the Zuckerberg-Hancock meeting. She also criticized the department for claiming that the publication of the notes would lead to future discussions that are “confidential” and not recorded for fear of possible disclosure “.
It added: “Access to information rights depends on the authorities documenting their main activities and decisions. Failure to do so can undermine public accountability, historical records and public confidence. ”
The ICO decided that it was in the public interest to publish the information and stated, “As the world’s dominant social media platform, Facebook has an unrivaled position and ability to influence government policy and regulation.
“In the Commissioner’s view, the need for adequate transparency and openness in the present case is particularly acute given Mr Zuckerberg’s absence in the UK public domain … given the high level of personal control over which the founder and CEO of Facebook has in part According to the Commissioner, the most influential and powerful social media platform in the UK, the demand for such transparency is correspondingly high. “
Critics claim that Facebook’s lack of regulation of content on its platforms – including Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp – contributed to tragic events around the world. Some say the platforms were used by others to instigate the genocide of the Rohingya Muslim minority in Myanmar, organize a militia event in Kenosha that resulted in the deaths of two people, in live streaming of a massacre of Muslims in New Zealand and Contribution to the suicide of British teenage girl Molly Russell.
The Digital, Culture, Media and Sport selection committee is currently investigating Facebook’s role in spreading vaccination misinformation on its platforms.
In the UK, the government is considering regulating Facebook and other platforms to protect people from “online harm” including disinformation, child sexual exploitation, terrorist content, hate crimes, incitement to violence, harassment and content that promotes suicide. The proposed legislation will effectively involve a regulator that will ensure tech companies adhere to their own terms and conditions.